|
UNDPI / Armenia - 16 January 2004, Yerevan -- The Committee on
the Rights of the Child today reviewed the second periodic report
of Armenia on how that country is complying with the provisions
of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Introducing
the report, Armenia's Minister of Social Security, Aghvan Vardanyan,
said that since the consideration of the initial report, Armenia
had continued to comply with the provisions of the Convention through
the implementation of legislative and administrative measures. Most
of its activities had been concentrated on social activities that
aimed at enhancing children's rights in the country.
In
preliminary concluding remarks, Committee Expert Joyce Aluoch, who
served as country rapporteur to the report of Armenia, said the
State party should take further action to ratify the two Optional
Protocols to the Convention on the sale of children, child prostitution
and child pornography, and on children in armed conflicts. She also
encouraged the State party to ratify International Labour Organization
Conventions 182 and 138 without waiting for the adoption of the
new labour law.
The
Committee will issue its formal, written concluding observations
and recommendations on the report of Armenia towards the end of
its three-week session on 31 January.
The
Armenian delegation was also composed of Zorab Mnatsakanian, Permanent
Representative of Armenia to the United Nations Office at Geneva;
Karine Soudjyan, Head of Human Rights Desk, Department of International
Organizations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Marta Ayvazyan, First
Secretary of the Permanent Mission of Armenia to the United Nations
Office at Geneva; Nelly Douryan, Head of Juvenile Affairs Division,
Department of Criminal Affairs, Ministry of the Interior; and Karine
Saribekyan, Head of Maternity and Child Health Protection Division,
Department of Health Care System Management, Ministry of Health.
As one of the 192 States parties to the Convention, Armenia is
expected to provide periodic reports for consideration by the Committee
on its efforts to comply with the provisions of the treaty.
When the Committee reconvenes at 10 a.m. on Friday, 16 January,
it will review the second periodic report of Germany (CRC/C/83/Add.7).
Report of Armenia
The
second periodic report of Armenia (CRC/C/93/Add.6) contains information
on the efforts made by the State party to comply with the provisions
of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. It notes that the
Convention has been translated into Armenian and has been widely
disseminated both among the general public and to specialists. The
State has taken the necessary legislative, administrative and other
steps to implement the provisions of the Convention. In order to
ensure that children's rights are fully upheld in the country, a
series of laws have been adopted since Armenia ratified the Convention
on 1 June 1992.
The
report says traditionally, Armenian families have always been very
child-oriented. The welfare of children has always been a central
concern of the Armenian State. State policy is designed to protect
the interests of the family and a number of special measures have
been developed to ensure the protection of families in which the
parents are divorced and families which have children born out of
wedlock or adopted children. Further, the report notes that non-governmental
organizations are actively involved in children's issues. In 1999,
an alternative report on the implementation of the provisions of
the Convention was prepared and published by a number of Armenian
non-governmental organizations (NGOs), with financial support from
the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF).
Introductory
Statement
AGHVAN
VARDANYAN, Minister of Social Security of Armenia, said the report
included responses to the comments and recommendations made by the
Committee following its consideration of the initial report of Armenia.
Since
the consideration of the initial report, Armenia had continued to
comply with the provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the
Child through the implementation of legislative and administrative
measures, the Minister said. Most of its activities in favour of
children were focused on social areas. In 2003, the Government had
provided social assistance to 250,000 children. It had also taken
measures to improve many children's institutions in the country.
During the period 2001 to 2003, a number of documents had been adopted
that guaranteed for children who were in need of alternate care
a whole range of services and care institutions that provided support
for such children.
Mr.
Vardanyan said that one of the problems requiring solutions was
the issue of children with disabilities. The Government had continued
to provide assistance to children with disabilities, and further
efforts were being made to integrate them into society. With the
active participation of public organizations for children with disabilities
and their parents, courses were being held to teach such children
various skills and to promote their socialization.
In
2003, the Government had approved a long-term poverty eradication
programme --the Strategic Programme to Overcome Poverty -- a priority
area of which included the provision of high-quality education and
equal access to all levels of education, he said. Money obtained
from taxes would be channelled to the activities of the poverty
eradication programme.
Mr.
Vardanyan said that several non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
had been actively participating in the promotion and protection
of children in the country. With the support of the United Nations
Children's Fund (UNICEF), Armenia had also made progress in many
areas, including social and educational fields.
The
Minister said that in October 2003, the National Programme of Action
to Protect Children's Rights had been submitted to the Government
for approval. The Programme included a number of measures on the
provision of medical assistance, social protection, and implementation
of educational programmes for children, among other things. The
Programme was a long-term project to be implemented from 2004 to
2015.
Discussion
JOYCE
ALUOCH, the Committee Expert who served as country rapporteur to
the report of Armenia, said the report had been prepared in accordance
to the guidelines of the Committee contrary to the previous one.
She said that the family law had been adopted, but it was not yet
clear when children would start to enjoy its provisions. The report
did not indicate the analysis made on the data collected on children.
She asked if non-governmental organizations (NGOs) had participated
in the preparation of the national plan of action for children?
Had children and NGOs participated in the preparation of the report?
Armenian
law prohibited acts of discrimination, but there seemed to exist
discrimination against children with disabilities, refugee children
and street children, Ms. Aluoch noted.
Another
Expert said that there was no clear definition of the child with
regard to the minimum age for sexual consent and criminal responsibility.
An Expert asked if data collection was limited to children living
in institutions or if it was extended to all children? She wanted
to know if the activities of NGOs had been reduced due to certain
constraints? Another speaker asked if the text of the Convention
was distributed to school children.
Responding,
the delegation said that in 2003, the Government had adopted the
programme on the protection of the rights of the child based on
the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Several international
organizations, including NGOs, had participated in its elaboration.
Although children were not directly involved in the process, they
were indirectly consulted.
With
regard to the creation of the Ombudsman for children, the law entered
on 1 January 2004 provided for such an establishment, and according
to the law, it would be an independent institution, the delegation
said. It would not be subordinate either to the parliament or the
office of the Head of State.
Asked
about the rank of international treaties, the delegation said that
all international conventions ratified by the country took precedence
over domestic laws. Any treaty was ratified by the State after the
Constitutional Council approved it.
Armenia
was at present elaborating a new labour law, which would enable
it to ratify International Labour Organization conventions which
it had not ratified, the delegation said. It was implementing the
ILO conventions that it had already approved.
Because
of financial difficulties, the budget allocation for children had
been cut last year, the delegation said. However, the budget in
social affairs had been increased in this year's budgetary allocation.
The Government had also adopted a strategic programme for the eradication
of poverty.
The
new amendment to the Children's Rights Act provided for the right
of children to be heard and to express freely their opinions, the
delegation said. Further, their right to participate in decisions
concerning them had been stressed, including the consideration of
their views in all areas. Anti-discrimination provisions had been
strengthened with regard to refugee children and children with disabilities,
as well as other vulnerable groups of children, the delegation said.
The problem regarding the 350,000 refugees who had ended up in Armenia
had also been given special focus. Although those refugees were
ethnic Armenians, measures had been taken for their integration
because of their displacement from their place of origin.
On
the mandate of the National Commission on the Rights of the Child,
the delegation said it was set up to elaborate the national plan
of action for children and later its mandate had been extended to
deal with other issues pertaining to children's rights.
Since
1993, Armenia had been cooperating with a number of NGOs, the delegation
said. Those NGOs had been exempted from property taxes. The Government,
in collaboration with NGOs, had implemented a number of projects
for children.
Committee
Experts raised further questions, among other things, on the registration
of births in remote regions; training of magistrates on children's
rights; the large number of children deprived of a family environment
and living in institutions; maintenance of children born out of
wedlock; and the situation of children with disabilities living
in rural areas.
An
Expert asked why tuberculosis was a wide-spread problem? She also
noted that children were not immunized from all preventable diseases
due to lack of vaccines. What progress had been made on breastfeeding?
Questions were also raised on problems caused by the transitional
nature of Armenia's economy; regulations concerning the registering
of newborns; and how the conflict in Nagorno-Karabagh was affecting
children?
An
Expert asked about the efforts made by the Government to improve
the educational system. He said teachers were not well paid; the
rate of dropouts was high; there were still children who never went
to school or attended school only for a few years; and the free
primary compulsory education in fact incurred financial expenses
in terms of school materials.
Speaking
on the same subject, another Expert said that there were about 28,000
teachers who were retiring without being replaced, which was an
additional concern with regard to the educational system. Other
Experts also asked, among other things, about the high rate of school
absenteeism; violence against children; the provision of alimony
by absentee fathers; and whether training was provided for health
care personnel on the rights of the child.
Responding,
the delegation said that for the past few years, the Government
had been making efforts to build and refurbish theatres and recreation
centres for children. The measures were first implemented in the
cities and later they were extended to other regions. The World
Bank was participating in the educational system of Armenia by providing
computers.
Concerning adoptions, the delegation said that the law on adoptions
had been amended last year to bring it in line with the Hague Convention
on the Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry
Adoption (the Hague Adoption Convention). In the past, adoption
was allowed only within the country. Children could express their
opinions at the time of their adoption if they were old enough.
School attendance had fallen sharply in Armenia in recent years,
the delegation said. With regard to the shortage of teachers, the
Government was planning to double their salaries within the coming
two years to entice them to stay in the profession and to recruit
new teachers. In many cases, teachers received low salaries and
they were not paid regularly. The fact that some teachers were retiring
from their profession did not imply a reduction in the quality of
education. The Government would continue to give primary importance
to education.
Only 10 per cent of new births were not registered last year because
parents did not have national passports, the delegation said. Pregnant
women were told in advance to prepare their national passports to
facilitate the registration of their newborns. The problem had been
reduced during the last few years because most Armenians possessed
national passports.
Although tuberculosis continued to affect people in the country,
the disease affected children to a lesser degree, the delegation
said. Cases of meningitis had been detected among children due to
the lack of a preventive vaccination against the disease.
Since the conflict over Nagorno-Karabagh had obliged people to
flee the area, many children had been born to parents who had taken
refuge in Armenia, the delegation said. The earthquake that hit
the county had also left a negative effect on the conditions of
children in the region. Committee Experts further queried the delegation
on such issues as drug abuse; the increase in the number of prostitutes;
the age for criminal responsibility for children who committed serious
crimes; the use of extra-curricular activities and the inculcation
of patriotism; the enforced recruitment of Azerbaijani children
into the Armenian army; the loss of citizenship after 14 years of
age for certain categories of children; absence of juvenile courts
in some areas; and the fate of street children taken to reception
centres.
Responding, the delegation said that children were not called up
to serve in the army before the age of 18 years. The delegation
noted that there might have been cases where children below the
age of 18 were called up before 1994 when the conflict with Azerbaijan
was sparked over the Nagorno-Karabagh issue.
There were about 336,000 refugees in Armenia coming from Azerbaijan,
the delegation said. While many of them had obtained Armenian nationality,
the situation of others had not yet been resolved, and some of them
had migrated to other countries.
Armenia had put a series of laws in place to fight trafficking
in persons and to repress the offenders. Acts of trafficking had
been made criminal offences and the perpetrators had been brought
to justice.
On the issue of abandoned children, the delegation said that the
problem emerged in the 1990s when many children began working or
begging on the streets. The problem had been tackled, thanks to
the measures taken by the Government and NGOs to rehabilitate the
children by providing them with vocational training or by reintegrating
them into their families.
On crimes by minors, the delegation said that in 2000, minors had
committed 64 serious crimes, while in 2003 only 27 serious crimes
had been committed. At the minors detention centre, there were only
10 children serving sentences.
The police fought drug addiction and prostitution systematically,
the delegation said.
Preliminary Concluding Remarks
JOYCE ALUOCH, the Committee Expert who served as country rapporteur
to the report of Armenia, said that although the State party had
ratified the European Social Chapter, the country had no policy
on trafficking in women and children. She recommended that the State
party take further action that would enable it to ratify the two
Optional Protocols to the Convention on the sale of children, child
prostitution and child pornography, and on children in armed conflicts.
She also encouraged the State party to ratify ILO Conventions 182
and 138 without waiting for the adoption of the new labour law.
A timeframe was necessary for the adoption of the two Conventions.
The creation of the data bank for children was a good move, as was
the adoption of the law on the setting up of the office of the Ombudsman.
The Ombudsman to be appointed should not be subordinate to either
the parliament or the Government.
|