|
The OSCE Minsk Group Fact-Finding Mission has officially presented
its report to the OSCE Permanent Council. Armenia appreciates the
diligent, hard work of the Minsk Group co-chairs and the members of
the Mission. We believe that their detailed, first-hand, objective
report clearly describes the situation on the ground in the region.
Armenia is pleased that it was able to facilitate the mission.
Armenia also wishes to thank the authorities of Nagorno Karabakh
for their logistical and practical contributions to the success
of the Mission.
Armenia believes that the most important accomplishment of the
Fact Finding Mission Report is that it has laid to rest Azerbaijan's
charges.
At the beginning of this process, Azerbaijan had claimed that
a. There are excessively large numbers of settlers in the territories
surrounding Nagorno Karabakh. At various times, their numbers ranged
from 30,000 to 300,000 even;
b. The Republic of Armenia is directly, intentionally engaged in
the so-called settlement process, and even has a state policy of
settlement, with budgetary allocations;
c. Overwhelming majority of settlers are citizens of Armenia, or
from the Diaspora.
The Fact Finding Mission Report affirms the following:
a. "Overall settlement is quite limited." "There
is no clear organized resettlement, no non-voluntary resettlement,
no recruitment." "
populations the Fact-Finding
Mission has interviewed, counted or directly observed are as follows:
in Kelbajar District approximately 1,500; in Agdam District from
800 to 1,000, in Fizuli District under 10; in Jebrail District under
100; in Zangelan District from 700 to 1,000; and in Kubatly District
from 1,000 to 1,500
In Lachin, the Fact Finding Mission estimates
that there are fewer than 8,000 people living in the district overall."
b. The co-chairs say, "The mission did not determine that such
settlement has resulted from a deliberate policy by the government
of Armenia." The Report says, "The Fact-Finding Mission
has seen no evidence of direct involvement by the authorities of
Armenia in the territories."
c. Those settlers who have found refuge in these territories are
primarily from regions of Azerbaijan: "The Fact-Finding Mission
has concluded that the overwhelming majority of settlers are displaced
persons from various parts of Azerbaijan, notably, from Shahumian
(Goranboy) Getashen (Chaikent)-now under Azerbaijani control - and
Sumgait and Baku."
In light of these conclusions, we note that the total number of
settlers is insignificant given that there are over 400,000 Armenian
refugees as a result of the conflict. Without those living in Lachin,
then the total number of settlers is indeed negligible. The co-chairs
have noted that "Lachin has been treated as a separate case
in previous negotiations." This is because Lachin is Nagorno
Karabakh's humanitarian and security corridor. Without it, Nagorno
Karabakh would remain an isolated enclave. It is because of Lachin's
political and geographic reality and security dimension, that it
is viewed differently in the negotiation process.
Furthermore, the co-chairs state: "
most settlers interviewed
by the Fact Finding Mission expressed a desire to return to the
areas from which they fled
" However, their old homes,
in areas which were formerly Armenian-populated, are today under
Azerbaijani control, and their homes have been appropriated by Azerbaijanis.
According to the United Nations Economic and Social Council Committee
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights "The Committee is concerned
about the illegal occupation by refugees and internally displaced
persons of properties belonging to Armenians and other ethnic minorities."
Armenia, at the request of the authorities of Nagorno Karabakh,
has requested that the OSCE Permanent Council mandate a fact-finding
mission for a similarly transparent assessment of those regions
which were formerly largely-Armenian populated, and are today under
Azerbaijan's control: the Northern Martakert and Eastern Martuni
regions of Nagorno Karabakh, and Shahumian.
This process of the Fact Finding Mission began because Azerbaijan
claimed there was intentional, massive, coordinated settlement policy
which would harm the negotiations process. Armenia agreed to facilitate
a fact-finding mission and Azerbaijan agreed in return not to take
any action on its UN resolution and suspend the initiative.
Yerevan
March 17, 2005
|